.png){kind=logo}
The following is an illustrative, composite scenario based on patterns we commonly see across commercial real estate clients. It is not a specific named client engagement.
The Challenge
A regional owner-operator with a portfolio of mid-rise Class B office properties wanted to introduce a consistent scent program across roughly a dozen buildings as part of a broader push to reposition several aging assets and support renewal rates in a competitive leasing market. Leadership was convinced of the concept in principle but wary of committing to portfolio-wide installation without evidence it would work across buildings with meaningfully different HVAC configurations, lobby sizes, and tenant profiles. Two prior vendor relationships at the company had installed fragrance equipment without much follow-up tuning, and the resulting inconsistent, sometimes overly strong scent in a handful of lobbies had made property management cautious about repeating the mistake at scale.
The Approach
Rather than rolling out to the full portfolio at once, the owner selected two representative properties for an initial pilot — one recently renovated flagship asset with a larger, more open lobby, and one older, more typical building with a smaller entry and a dated HVAC system more representative of the rest of the portfolio. The pilot began with an on-site assessment of airflow, HVAC zoning, and traffic patterns at each property, followed by fragrance selection calibrated to each building's class and tenant mix rather than a single scent applied to both.
Diffusion equipment was installed with placement driven by the airflow assessment rather than convenience, and both properties received a tuning visit three weeks after installation to adjust concentration and confirm coverage matched the intended zones. Property management at both sites was asked to flag any tenant comments — positive or negative — during the pilot period, and a follow-up walkthrough was scheduled at the next HVAC seasonal changeover to test whether the initial tuning held up once airflow conditions shifted.
The Outcome
The pilot surfaced two issues that would have been more costly to catch at full portfolio scale. First, the fragrance concentration that worked well in the larger, more open flagship lobby read as noticeably stronger in the smaller, more enclosed lobby at the second property, confirming that a single fixed setting across dissimilar buildings would not have worked and that per-property tuning needed to be built into the rollout plan from the start. Second, the seasonal changeover walkthrough caught a diffuser placement issue at one property where a shift in HVAC airflow direction was pulling fragrance away from the main entry rather than through it — a placement fix took under an hour to correct once identified, but would likely have gone unnoticed for months without a scheduled seasonal check.
With those lessons incorporated into the fragrance-selection and tuning framework, the owner moved forward with a phased rollout across the remaining portfolio, grouping buildings by lobby size and HVAC configuration similarity rather than treating every property identically. Property management reported that leasing staff at the pilot buildings began referencing the lobby experience informally in tours within the first two months, and the owner adopted the pilot-then-scale approach as standard practice for future portfolio-wide initiatives beyond scent.
This piece is part of our work in commercial property scenting. Related reading: Scent Programs, Wellness Certification, and Indoor Air Quality: What Property Teams Need to Know.